Nuke lots of obsolete compiler versions

Make gcc4 depend on !LINUX_2_4 - I'm getting sick of seeing people complain about
compile errors when trying to build brcm-2.4 with it.


git-svn-id: svn://svn.openwrt.org/openwrt/trunk@6744 3c298f89-4303-0410-b956-a3cf2f4a3e73

1 files changed, 0 insertions, 65 deletions

diff --git a/toolchain/gcc/patches/3.4.5/600-gcc34-arm-ldm-peephole.patch b/toolchain/gcc/patches/3.4.5/600-gcc34-arm-ldm-peephole.patch
deleted file mode 100644
index 0c370502c8..0000000000
--- a/toolchain/gcc/patches/3.4.5/600-gcc34-arm-ldm-peephole.patch
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,65 +0,0 @@
---- gcc-3.4.0/gcc/config/arm/arm.md.arm-ldm-peephole	2004-01-13 08:24:37.000000000 -0500
-+++ gcc-3.4.0/gcc/config/arm/arm.md	2004-04-24 18:18:04.000000000 -0400
-@@ -8810,13 +8810,16 @@
-    (set_attr "length" "4,8,8")]
- )
- 
-+; Try to convert LDR+LDR+arith into [add+]LDM+arith
-+; On XScale, LDM is always slower than two LDRs, so only do this if
-+; optimising for size.
- (define_insn "*arith_adjacentmem"
-   [(set (match_operand:SI 0 "s_register_operand" "=r")
- 	(match_operator:SI 1 "shiftable_operator"
- 	 [(match_operand:SI 2 "memory_operand" "m")
- 	  (match_operand:SI 3 "memory_operand" "m")]))
-    (clobber (match_scratch:SI 4 "=r"))]
--  "TARGET_ARM && adjacent_mem_locations (operands[2], operands[3])"
-+  "TARGET_ARM && (!arm_tune_xscale || optimize_size) && adjacent_mem_locations (operands[2], operands[3])"
-   "*
-   {
-     rtx ldm[3];
-@@ -8851,6 +8854,8 @@
-       }
-    if (val1 && val2)
-       {
-+	/* This would be a loss on a Harvard core, but adjacent_mem_locations()
-+	   will prevent it from happening.  */
- 	rtx ops[3];
- 	ldm[0] = ops[0] = operands[4];
- 	ops[1] = XEXP (XEXP (operands[2], 0), 0);
---- gcc-3.4.0/gcc/config/arm/arm.c.arm-ldm-peephole	2004-04-24 18:16:25.000000000 -0400
-+++ gcc-3.4.0/gcc/config/arm/arm.c	2004-04-24 18:18:04.000000000 -0400
-@@ -4838,6 +4841,11 @@
-       *load_offset = unsorted_offsets[order[0]];
-     }
- 
-+  /* For XScale a two-word LDM is a performance loss, so only do this if
-+     size is more important.  See comments in arm_gen_load_multiple.  */
-+  if (nops == 2 && arm_tune_xscale && !optimize_size)
-+    return 0;
-+
-   if (unsorted_offsets[order[0]] == 0)
-     return 1; /* ldmia */
- 
-@@ -5064,6 +5072,11 @@
-       *load_offset = unsorted_offsets[order[0]];
-     }
- 
-+  /* For XScale a two-word LDM is a performance loss, so only do this if
-+     size is more important.  See comments in arm_gen_load_multiple.  */
-+  if (nops == 2 && arm_tune_xscale && !optimize_size)
-+    return 0;
-+
-   if (unsorted_offsets[order[0]] == 0)
-     return 1; /* stmia */
- 
---- gcc-3.4.0/gcc/genpeep.c.arm-ldm-peephole	2003-07-05 01:27:22.000000000 -0400
-+++ gcc-3.4.0/gcc/genpeep.c	2004-04-24 18:18:04.000000000 -0400
-@@ -381,6 +381,7 @@
-   printf ("#include \"recog.h\"\n");
-   printf ("#include \"except.h\"\n\n");
-   printf ("#include \"function.h\"\n\n");
-+  printf ("#include \"flags.h\"\n\n");
- 
-   printf ("#ifdef HAVE_peephole\n");
-   printf ("extern rtx peep_operand[];\n\n");