From 59da09e12dedf616af8614d2fc13ca57dcecf01a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: nbd Date: Sat, 10 Jul 2010 00:48:37 +0000 Subject: Get rid of the b44 'BUG! Timeout waiting for bit 80000000 of register 428 to clear.' spam. more and more users are getting confused by this, and consider it a regression in brcm47xx, because brcm-2.4 was not showing this message. It's not particularly interesting for debugging, most of the time it only happens because of an unconnected port. git-svn-id: svn://svn.openwrt.org/openwrt/trunk@22110 3c298f89-4303-0410-b956-a3cf2f4a3e73 --- .../brcm47xx/patches-2.6.34/211-b44_timeout_spam.patch | 16 ++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+) create mode 100644 target/linux/brcm47xx/patches-2.6.34/211-b44_timeout_spam.patch (limited to 'target/linux/brcm47xx/patches-2.6.34/211-b44_timeout_spam.patch') diff --git a/target/linux/brcm47xx/patches-2.6.34/211-b44_timeout_spam.patch b/target/linux/brcm47xx/patches-2.6.34/211-b44_timeout_spam.patch new file mode 100644 index 0000000000..d5ade16c70 --- /dev/null +++ b/target/linux/brcm47xx/patches-2.6.34/211-b44_timeout_spam.patch @@ -0,0 +1,16 @@ +--- a/drivers/net/b44.c ++++ b/drivers/net/b44.c +@@ -190,11 +190,12 @@ static int b44_wait_bit(struct b44 *bp, + break; + udelay(10); + } ++#if 0 + if (i == timeout) { + if (net_ratelimit()) + netdev_err(bp->dev, "BUG! Timeout waiting for bit %08x of register %lx to %s\n", + bit, reg, clear ? "clear" : "set"); +- ++#endif + return -ENODEV; + } + return 0; -- cgit v1.2.3